<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: site updates ahoy!</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steevo</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/comment-page-1/#comment-51308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steevo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/05/16/990/#comment-51308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the new theme looks beautiful! The green linkies are cool as they are-- a good match. Do we need a separate high-contrast mode? And you emulate Google by using this font, of course, but Trebuchet and others certainly have more flair. So what&#039;s my silly complaint? Too bad that forms adopt system color for the text in  fields, which in my case is white, so I have to type, then highlight to see what I wrote. Why don&#039;t I just use default colors? I&#039;m obstinate that way (and want to see what things do when not the default).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new theme looks beautiful! The green linkies are cool as they are&#8211; a good match. Do we need a separate high-contrast mode? And you emulate Google by using this font, of course, but Trebuchet and others certainly have more flair. So what&#8217;s my silly complaint? Too bad that forms adopt system color for the text in  fields, which in my case is white, so I have to type, then highlight to see what I wrote. Why don&#8217;t I just use default colors? I&#8217;m obstinate that way (and want to see what things do when not the default).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/comment-page-1/#comment-50872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/05/16/990/#comment-50872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad:  Yeah, I&#039;m not a fan of the font either.  I&#039;m open to suggestions.  

I would have fiddled with it myself last night (starting from the old theme&#039;s Trebuchet/Lucida Grande combination), but it didn&#039;t seem worth it after dorking around with the sidebar until midnight. 

In truth, I&#039;m not super keen on the green link color, either.   My inner low-vision user keeps yelling at me about it.  Still, I don&#039;t want to go back to boring boredom, so it&#039;ll take some tweaking to get the right balance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad:  Yeah, I&#8217;m not a fan of the font either.  I&#8217;m open to suggestions.  </p>
<p>I would have fiddled with it myself last night (starting from the old theme&#8217;s Trebuchet/Lucida Grande combination), but it didn&#8217;t seem worth it after dorking around with the sidebar until midnight. </p>
<p>In truth, I&#8217;m not super keen on the green link color, either.   My inner low-vision user keeps yelling at me about it.  Still, I don&#8217;t want to go back to boring boredom, so it&#8217;ll take some tweaking to get the right balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Fults</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/comment-page-1/#comment-50851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Fults]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/05/16/990/#comment-50851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dig the theme, though I&#039;m not a big fan of the font.

Looking forward to the other additions!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig the theme, though I&#8217;m not a big fan of the font.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the other additions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/comment-page-1/#comment-50819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 07:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/05/16/990/#comment-50819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phase 1 (moving to a new theme) is complete, at least as far as the newer parts of the site are concerned.  I still have some work to do, mostly getting the photos, book, and such looking like the new theme.

Let me know if you find anything amiss.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phase 1 (moving to a new theme) is complete, at least as far as the newer parts of the site are concerned.  I still have some work to do, mostly getting the photos, book, and such looking like the new theme.</p>
<p>Let me know if you find anything amiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2007/05/site-updates-ahoy/comment-page-1/#comment-50792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/05/16/990/#comment-50792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good choice on the theme.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice on the theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
