<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a call for help, a plea for sanity</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2006/04/28/772/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hm.  I like the definition given for Tautological Rationalizers:

&quot;Tautological Rationalizers are not hypocrites because their beliefs and perceptions of reality conform to support their own desires and imperfections. They can not be hypocrites because their beliefs and perceptions of reality are rationalizations for their actions and are without objectivity. When a state of hypocrisy arises, tautological rationalizers conform their beliefs around their actions to eliminate contradiction, rather than conforming their actions around their beliefs.&quot;

It would be nice to have something catchier, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  I like the definition given for Tautological Rationalizers:</p>
<p>&#8220;Tautological Rationalizers are not hypocrites because their beliefs and perceptions of reality conform to support their own desires and imperfections. They can not be hypocrites because their beliefs and perceptions of reality are rationalizations for their actions and are without objectivity. When a state of hypocrisy arises, tautological rationalizers conform their beliefs around their actions to eliminate contradiction, rather than conforming their actions around their beliefs.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be nice to have something catchier, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2006/04/28/772/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m voting for &quot;hypocrite&quot; or maybe just &quot;politician&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m voting for &#8220;hypocrite&#8221; or maybe just &#8220;politician&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deana</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 05:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2006/04/28/772/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about tautological rationalization? From here (interesting site anyway):

http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about tautological rationalization? From here (interesting site anyway):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>https://globalspin.com/2006/04/a-call-for-help-a-plea-for-sanity/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2006/04/28/772/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you may need to bring the verbivores in on this one.  I feel like there must be such a word, but I just cannot think of what it might be.

Funny enough, I understand and agree with your post.  But what bristled the hair on my neck was the phrase &quot;nuke the moon.&quot;  It&#039;s like &quot;stone the baby.&quot;  What the heck?  The moon never did anything to anyone!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may need to bring the verbivores in on this one.  I feel like there must be such a word, but I just cannot think of what it might be.</p>
<p>Funny enough, I understand and agree with your post.  But what bristled the hair on my neck was the phrase &#8220;nuke the moon.&#8221;  It&#8217;s like &#8220;stone the baby.&#8221;  What the heck?  The moon never did anything to anyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
