Comments on: Thing two https://globalspin.com/2005/05/thing-two/ a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8 By: Karen https://globalspin.com/2005/05/thing-two/comment-page-1/#comment-746 Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:02:08 +0000 http://globalspin.com/wp/2005/05/26/566/#comment-746 Okay. Now I feel silly.

]]> By: Deana https://globalspin.com/2005/05/thing-two/comment-page-1/#comment-745 Tue, 31 May 2005 02:50:08 +0000 http://globalspin.com/wp/2005/05/26/566/#comment-745 It’s a satire, using the same logic used to dismiss evolution to dismiss the 20th century. It’s just a theory, you know. We can’t PROVE it. So yes, it is a Kansas thing.

]]> By: Karen https://globalspin.com/2005/05/thing-two/comment-page-1/#comment-744 Mon, 30 May 2005 21:11:48 +0000 http://globalspin.com/wp/2005/05/26/566/#comment-744 What the heck? What have they been smoking?

Seriously, I don’t understand this. What do they mean, just a theory? They aren’t talking about “time” in a cosmological sense because otherwise they wouldn’t be going back to 1899. Are they saying that none of the events of the year occurred? That we were all in a time warp? Was it a kind of Voyager/Year from Hell type deal? I’m confused.

Is this a Kansas thing?

]]>