« IntarWeb U | Main | butterfly time »
March 30, 2005
the best they can do
Oh, this is just too sad for words. The other day I noticed an ad for the new GMC Sierra Hybrid Pickup. I was surprised by the idea that US automakers were finally getting on the hybrid bandwagon. Turns out I shouldn't have been.
Read on for the rant...
Toyota has had a working, useful hybrid vehicle for what, 7 years now, right? The demand for it is insatiable, and Toyota is taking home more awards and more money every year.
Honda has a whole line of hybrids, too, including a hybrid version of the popular Accord V-6 which gets 40% better fuel efficiency than the non-hybrid model (about 30mpg).
And what is GMC's exciting response to this, years later? A V-8 "hybrid" pickup which is (as the site puts it) "up to 10% more fuel efficient" than the dismal 18mpg of the standard model. Wait, 10%? That's... let's see... 2mpg better. Two. And the tailpipe emissions aren't improved at all. Why? Because the electric motor isn't used to move the vehicle at all. Not even a little. It's only used to keep things running when the vehicle is stopped or braking.
For this marvel of engineering, GMC adds $2500 to the cost. With the tiny mileage improvement, that only pays for itself at the pump after about 200,000 miles of city driving. For comparison, buying a brand new Prius and using it instead would pay for itself just as quickly. And that's just sad.
Posted by Chris at March 30, 2005 04:47 PMComments
Ooo. And the stupid thing is that people will buy such a truck and say, "Oh, see, I'm environmentally conscious, because it's a Hybrid." When it isn't! It's a conventional vehicle with a hybrid tumor! They really could do so much more.
Posted by: karen at March 31, 2005 08:06 AM"Hybrid tumor"! Hee hee...
Posted by: Deana at March 31, 2005 10:19 AMIndeed. I'm picturing our Governator shouting, "It's naht ah tumah!"
I forgot to mention that the ad was on top of a gas pump. They're almost certainly implying that the "10% better" mileage is a major feature.
Posted by: Chris at March 31, 2005 11:00 AMYeah, I saw that green washing BS at a trade show a few months ago. When I saw "hybrid" I thought great! A hybrid truck -- finally! As I would actually be in the market for one of those . . . When I asked about the gas mileage, I was told 17 city and 18 highway or something horrendous. I must have looked disgusted as he said, well it's a heavy truck you need a big engine to move it around, not like those little hybrids (that is bs as a Prius is somewhere around 3,000 lbs I believe). But then he was really quick to point out the plug in the back -- so you can use the car as an on-site generator. Useful, occasionally, but not very "green."
~d whos waiting, waiting for a true hybrid truck!
Posted by: deb at April 1, 2005 10:38 AMSeriously! I thought of you (Deb) immediately when I first saw this "hybrid" truck. Trucks would actually be good candidates for hybridization, because they're generally overpowered for city driving in order to have power available when hauling. A hybrid drivetrain would allow the gas-powered engine to produce less power in general by providing peak power from the electrical system. I think that's called integrated motor assist, but I Am Not An Automotive Engineer.
If they really wanted to get radical, they could design a V-8 which acts like a 4-cylinder engine in city driving conditions. I think that's how Honda can provide a "V-6" Accord Hybrid which gets the mileage of a 3-cylinder motor... because it's running on 3 cylinders most of the time. Again, IANAAE, but the folks at GM claim to be.
Posted by: Chris at April 1, 2005 10:55 AM
Yeek. That's so not worth it. One of my anthro colleagues just got kind of a deal on a Prius that was used as the test drive car on the Toyota lot. Green With. Envy.
Posted by: Deana at March 30, 2005 08:18 PM