<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Spin &#187; Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalspin.com/category/film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalspin.com</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>sci-fi film classics and the Bechdel test</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2009/06/sci-fi-classics-and-the-bechdel-test/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2009/06/sci-fi-classics-and-the-bechdel-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/?p=1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been having some fun thinking about the Bechdel test lately, specifically how many of my favorite sci-fi and fantasy films would pass it. To pass the test a movie must (a) have two women in it who (b) talk to each other (c) about something other than a man. The test itself fascinates me. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1567" title="River isn't talking, but who is?" src="http://globalspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/serenity2_wideweb__430x287-300x200.jpg" alt="River isn't talking, but who is?" width="300" height="200" />I&#8217;ve been having some fun thinking about the <a href="http://parabasis.typepad.com/blog/2008/07/the-bechdel-test.html">Bechdel test</a> lately, specifically how many of my favorite sci-fi and fantasy films would pass it. To pass the test a movie must (a) have two women in it who (b) talk to each other (c) about something other than a man.</p>
<p><span id="more-1566"></span>The test itself fascinates me. First of all, it doesn&#8217;t make any claims about quality or fairness, or even sexism <em>per se</em>; the two women could be delivering cliche lines about tax law while wrestling in mud. It&#8217;s also frightfully easy to make a movie that passes the test; just stick in a few minutes of mud-wrestling tax chat and proceed with the rest of your film as-is. (Yes I am looking at you, <em>Star Trek</em>.) It also shouldn&#8217;t be construed as an ultimate benchmark of feminism, because it&#8217;s possible to make a film that doesn&#8217;t pass but still treats women as first-class characters.</p>
<p>That said, the subset of my favorite sci-fi and fantasy films that would pass the test is an amazingly short list. Some of the dropouts (like <em>2001</em> and <em>Moon</em>) have few or no female characters, and some (like <em>Star Wars</em> and <em>The Princess Bride</em>) don&#8217;t have any conversations between women. In fact, finding a single genre favorite that passes starts to challenge my memory. <em>Brazil</em>? Nope. <em>Raiders</em>? Nope. <em>Back to the Future</em>? Nope for all three. <em>Lord of the Rings</em>? Heh.</p>
<p>Then I get to <em>Serenity</em>. OK, here we go. Joss Whedon, strong female characters, more than one on screen at a time. A cinch, right? Well&#8230; I&#8217;m trying really hard to remember a conversation between any two women in the film, and it just isn&#8217;t working. I&#8217;ll probably go through the script scene-by-scene just to check, but it should just pop to mind, right? Reverse genders and it&#8217;s obvious: Mal talks to the Operative on more than one occasion, Book and Mal share a nice moment, the Operative shares exposition with that functionary guy&#8211;and then impales him, but it still counts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard tell that the <em>Alien</em> movies qualify, but I must admit that I haven&#8217;t seen them. As for the rest of my list&#8230; well, I guess there isn&#8217;t one yet. I can&#8217;t think of a single genre film I&#8217;ve seen that passes the Bechdel test. Can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2009/06/sci-fi-classics-and-the-bechdel-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8:  The Musical</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2008/12/prop-8-the-musical/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2008/12/prop-8-the-musical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community & Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That which is awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[You have got to be kidding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/?p=1315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Monday! See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Monday!</p>
<p><object width="464" height="388" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"><param name="movie" value="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="key=c0cf508ff8" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="464" height="388" flashvars="key=c0cf508ff8" allowfullscreen="true" quality="high" src="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object>
<div style="text-align:center;width: 464px;">See more <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/jackblack">Jack Black</a> videos at Funny or Die</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2008/12/prop-8-the-musical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Tube Happens, or, Adventures in Eponymous Googling</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2008/10/you-tube-happens-or-adventures-in-eponymous-googling/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2008/10/you-tube-happens-or-adventures-in-eponymous-googling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News/Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oddly Enough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That which is awesome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what happens when the press visits: they come, say g&#8217;day, take some video and then disappear. Many moons later, you suddenly find yourself on You Tube. Well, they spelled my name wrong, but the video is still pretty good. (Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m as shocked as you are at how good I sound. They [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when the press visits:  they come, say g&#8217;day, take some video and then disappear.  Many moons later, you suddenly find yourself on You Tube.</p>
<p>Well, they spelled my name wrong, but the video is still pretty good.  (Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m as shocked as you are at how good I sound.  They must have done some heavy editing to make me seem so coherent.)</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PRlc0JZgG3s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PRlc0JZgG3s&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2008/10/you-tube-happens-or-adventures-in-eponymous-googling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Can you make me a thing? That looks like a thing?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2008/07/can-you-make-me-a-thing-that-looks-like-a-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2008/07/can-you-make-me-a-thing-that-looks-like-a-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deana]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plain foolishness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That which is awesome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Horrible: An oral history]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20213067_20213068_20214910,00.html"><strong>Dr. Horrible</strong>: An oral history</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2008/07/can-you-make-me-a-thing-that-looks-like-a-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Jackson is back on for both (yes, both) Hobbit films</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/12/peter-jackson-is-back-on-for-both-yes-both-hobbit-films/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/12/peter-jackson-is-back-on-for-both-yes-both-hobbit-films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/12/18/1094/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like New Line lived up to my previously-expressed hopes: they resolved their dispute with Peter Jackson, so he&#8217;s going to be writing and producing two Hobbit films. According to an Entertainment Weekly article: It&#8217;s back to Middle Earth for Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, and the boys from New Line. Finally, the years of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like New Line lived up to my <a title="Peter Jackson won't be making The Hobbit - Global Spin" href="http://globalspin.com/2006/11/20/862/">previously-expressed hopes</a>: they resolved their dispute with Peter Jackson, so he&#8217;s going to be writing and producing two Hobbit films. According to an <a title="'The Hobbit' is a go with Peter Jackson" href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/12/its-back-to-mid.html">Entertainment Weekly article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s back to Middle Earth for Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, and the boys from New Line. Finally, the years of disputes have ended, and the partners (including co-producer and co-distributor MGM) are gearing up for two new <em>Hobbit</em> movies.</p>
<p>Jackson and his life/creative partner Walsh have always envisioned the big-screen adaptation of <em>The Hobbit</em> as two movies. The first would deal with the 80-year old novel. The second, imagined entirely by Jackson and Walsh, would link the conclusion of <em>The Hobbit</em> to the start of the first <em>Lord of the Rings</em> book, <em>The Fellowship of the Rings</em>. New Line and Jackson will develop the properties over the next year with hopes of entering into pre-production by 2009 for a 2010 and 2011 release.</p></blockquote>
<p>So we can all do the dance of joy and then wait impatiently for 2010. Yays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/12/peter-jackson-is-back-on-for-both-yes-both-hobbit-films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Birds and the Bees</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/11/on-the-birds-and-the-bees/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/11/on-the-birds-and-the-bees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/11/20/1081/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a cute article about how Hollywood gets it wrong yet again. This time with the world of insects and how, well, the social ones are really all female. I mean, must we anthropomorphize even our sexist gender assumptions? via Feministing]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/science/13angi.html?_r=2&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin"> cute article about how Hollywood gets it wrong yet again.</a>  This time  with the world of insects and how, well, the social ones are really all female.  I mean, <em/>must</em> we anthropomorphize even our sexist gender assumptions?</p>
<p>via <a href="http://feministing.com/archives/008109.html#comments">Feministing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/11/on-the-birds-and-the-bees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A problem of translation</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/10/a-problem-of-translation/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/10/a-problem-of-translation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deana]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oddly Enough]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/10/19/1073/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This makes me happy just by existing. It&#8217;s called &#8220;A Wicked Deception&#8221; and it&#8217;s quite fine good.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlJsPEgXhC0">This</a> makes me happy just by existing. It&#8217;s called &#8220;A Wicked Deception&#8221; and it&#8217;s quite fine good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/10/a-problem-of-translation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the script unleashed</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/07/the-script-unleashed/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/07/the-script-unleashed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptFrenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/07/09/1035/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s what you&#8217;ve all* been waiting for, the blockbuster hit of Summer 2009. The Last Domino finally has a screenplay, and you finally have a chance to read it. Let me know what you think of it.** * Deana, basically ** only if you loved it]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s what you&#8217;ve all* been waiting for, the blockbuster hit of Summer 2009. <a href="http://globalspin.com/writing/the-last-domino/">The Last Domino</a> finally has a screenplay, and you finally have a chance to read it.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think of it.**</p>
<p>* Deana, basically<br />
** only if you loved it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/07/the-script-unleashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a minor victory, a minor defeat</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/a-minor-victory-a-minor-defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/a-minor-victory-a-minor-defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 05:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptFrenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/06/30/1028/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news: The script is done. The accursed, untenable, unsalable, hackneyed, nagging time travel screenplay has finally been completed. The entire plot outline was covered, the crises averted, the ending tied up in a neat bow. I&#8217;m done with the first draft. Done! The bad news: It&#8217;s less than 16,000 words, around 85 pages. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="The Last Domino preview poster" class="imagelink" href="http://globalspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/domino-poster-small.jpg"><img align="right" alt="The Last Domino preview poster" id="image1029" title="The Last Domino preview poster" src="http://globalspin.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/domino-poster-small.thumbnail.jpg" /></a>The good news: The script is done. The accursed, untenable, unsalable, hackneyed, nagging time travel screenplay has finally been completed. The entire plot outline was covered, the crises averted, the ending tied up in a neat bow. I&#8217;m done with the first draft. Done!</p>
<p>The bad news: It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.scriptfrenzy.org/eng/user/143093">less than 16,000 words</a>, around 85 pages. That&#8217;s probably too short to be a truly complete draft (there are lots of places where more dialogue or description is probably necessary), and it&#8217;s over 4,000 words shy of winning the Script Frenzy challenge. It&#8217;s the very last night of the month, and there&#8217;s no way I could add that much to the script in time to meet the deadline tonight.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the kicker: I don&#8217;t really want to, either. Sure, I could write a couple dozen pages&#8217; worth of space monkeys attacking, but it just doesn&#8217;t feel worthwhile. Not the script itself; I&#8217;m immensely proud of completing it, and I think it could be pounded into something mildly entertaining with a few more drafts. I&#8217;m glad I spent some time this month working on it, but I&#8217;m also glad I didn&#8217;t spend any more time on it than I did. It&#8217;s been a busy month in all respects, and when it came right down to it I picked family, friends, other projects, and sleep (oh, that) over meeting a screenplay challenge.</p>
<p>From here&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure. I&#8217;m thinking of asking K to check it for embarrassing bits. If she doesn&#8217;t howl with laughter, I&#8217;ll post it in the <a href="http://globalspin.com/writing">writing section</a> for your amusement.</p>
<p>Final word count: 15,741.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/a-minor-victory-a-minor-defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>in which our protagonists share their first kiss</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/in-which-our-protagonists-share-their-first-kiss/</link>
		<comments>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/in-which-our-protagonists-share-their-first-kiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 06:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptFrenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/2007/06/21/1027/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I just made it through one of those sections of the plot outline that was a single line, and even that line was hand-waving. (Seriously, it read &#8220;Block 5: montage of LURVE.&#8221;) It&#8217;s the part of most movies that doesn&#8217;t work at all if the actors don&#8217;t have chemistry and the director doesn&#8217;t have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I just made it through one of those sections of the plot outline that was a single line, and even that line was hand-waving. (Seriously, it read &#8220;Block 5: montage of LURVE.&#8221;) It&#8217;s the part of most movies that doesn&#8217;t work at all if the actors don&#8217;t have chemistry and the director doesn&#8217;t have a soul, so there&#8217;s usually not a lot going on in the script.</p>
<p>Unless that script is <em>The Princess Bride</em>.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen that film, go watch it now. <em>Now</em>. I&#8217;ll wait. Done? Okay. Compare the scene in the fire swamp with the scene at the beginning with the water jug. Which one makes you believe that these two people love each other? Which one makes you wonder if it&#8217;s going to be a kissing book? Exactly. What&#8217;s the difference? In the fire swamp, the actors have a steady stream of dialogue and actions they can hang their emotions on, and the director has a million places to insert a hand-holding here, a quick embrace there, a significant look.</p>
<p>I did not, in fact, write a scene like that. However, the scenes I wrote were a lot more like that than the water jug scenes, so I&#8217;m hoping the audience won&#8217;t have to take it on faith that these two cardboard cutouts really are meant for each other. That will come in handy in the next few scenes when I pit them against each other.</p>
<p>Word count so far: 6,965.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://globalspin.com/2007/06/in-which-our-protagonists-share-their-first-kiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
