<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, It Was On the SIXTH Day&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalspin.com/2004/05/oh-it-was-on-the-sixth-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalspin.com/2004/05/oh-it-was-on-the-sixth-day/</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2004/05/oh-it-was-on-the-sixth-day/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 17:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2004/05/04/332/#comment-420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! I hope no one tries this experiment based solely on this description:</p>
<p>_Somewhat more creationist in approach is the Nerve-Wracking Ball: a bowling ball on a rope, dangling from a tall tree branch. A child stands before the ball, and then a park guide gives it a shove from a specific angle, so that it comes careering back at the child&#8217;s face only to stop just in front of it. The child wins if he does not flinch, proving he has &#8220;faith in God&#8217;s laws&#8221; ó in this case, that a swinging object will never come back higher than the point from which it took off._</p>
<p>I know the &#8220;actual experiment&#8221;:<a href="http://demoroom.physics.ncsu.edu/html/demos/427.html" rel="nofollow">http://demoroom.physics.ncsu.edu/html/demos/427.html</a>, and it requires that you *don&#8217;t* shove the ball but rather drop it from a point along its arc. Conservation of energy implies that it will never swing back higher than the original spot.</p>
<p>Of course, now that I mention it, which of &#8220;God&#8217;s laws&#8221; is conservation of energy?  Or is there a &#8220;Thou shalt not produce energy without reducing it elswhere&#8221; commandment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
