<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worthy of The Onion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deana</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/04/195/#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was 6 years ago. I don&#039;t remember. I remember discussing the scene with Doogie Howser violating the alien and we disagreed about what it meant. But I was trying to illustrate a different point, anyway. Ah well.

Deana
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was 6 years ago. I don&#8217;t remember. I remember discussing the scene with Doogie Howser violating the alien and we disagreed about what it meant. But I was trying to illustrate a different point, anyway. Ah well.</p>
<p>Deana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/04/195/#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to turn this into a discussion about Starship Troopers, but I need to clarify Deana&#039;s statements.  The movie satirizes militaristic thinking and jingoism, but the original book did not.  In fact, the book has often been criticized for presenting a militaristic, police-state society as a solution to current social ills.  (Whether that&#039;s true is left as an exercise for the reader.)

The satire is just one of the ways in which the book and movie differ, and I actually thought it detracted from what what the film could have been.  It certainly would have been tough to miss, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to turn this into a discussion about Starship Troopers, but I need to clarify Deana&#8217;s statements.  The movie satirizes militaristic thinking and jingoism, but the original book did not.  In fact, the book has often been criticized for presenting a militaristic, police-state society as a solution to current social ills.  (Whether that&#8217;s true is left as an exercise for the reader.)</p>
<p>The satire is just one of the ways in which the book and movie differ, and I actually thought it detracted from what what the film could have been.  It certainly would have been tough to miss, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/04/195/#comment-207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of an article I read a few months ago written by a woman who has two biological children and several adopted children of different ethnicities.  One of her daughters, who is African-American, is constantly bombarded when they go shopping with comments about how pretty she is;  her brother, adopted from Korea, is told over and over how pretty his eyes are.  At one point the little girl asks, &quot;Why doesn&#039;t anyone ever tell Kate [the woman&#039;s biological, white daughter] how pretty she is?&quot;  The tone of the article suggests that the former girl is actually becoming withdrawn about her appearance because the comments make her uncomfortable, not proud.

I bring this up because people often think they&#039;re doing &quot;the right thing&quot; but the problem is, they&#039;re just not thinking.  One woman, in her comments on the site, remarked how living as a non-African in Africa made her realize how easy it was to feel conspicuous in so many little ways.  I guess the point is to not make people feel conspicuous, but rather to accept them as a part of your world.  Who goes around telling his/her sibling how pretty her hair is all the time?  The sibling eventually is going to want to smack you.  

A quick response to the comment Deana made in her second paragraph:  I agree that media can try to prove a point and sometimes end up doing the opposite.  I had the exact response to Natural Born Killers--I felt the message was that we glorify people who do these awful things;  but Stone&#039;s movie ended up doing just that, to the point of overshadowing his own point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of an article I read a few months ago written by a woman who has two biological children and several adopted children of different ethnicities.  One of her daughters, who is African-American, is constantly bombarded when they go shopping with comments about how pretty she is;  her brother, adopted from Korea, is told over and over how pretty his eyes are.  At one point the little girl asks, &#8220;Why doesn&#8217;t anyone ever tell Kate [the woman's biological, white daughter] how pretty she is?&#8221;  The tone of the article suggests that the former girl is actually becoming withdrawn about her appearance because the comments make her uncomfortable, not proud.</p>
<p>I bring this up because people often think they&#8217;re doing &#8220;the right thing&#8221; but the problem is, they&#8217;re just not thinking.  One woman, in her comments on the site, remarked how living as a non-African in Africa made her realize how easy it was to feel conspicuous in so many little ways.  I guess the point is to not make people feel conspicuous, but rather to accept them as a part of your world.  Who goes around telling his/her sibling how pretty her hair is all the time?  The sibling eventually is going to want to smack you.  </p>
<p>A quick response to the comment Deana made in her second paragraph:  I agree that media can try to prove a point and sometimes end up doing the opposite.  I had the exact response to Natural Born Killers&#8211;I felt the message was that we glorify people who do these awful things;  but Stone&#8217;s movie ended up doing just that, to the point of overshadowing his own point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deana</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/worthy-of-the-onion/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/04/195/#comment-206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.. I think I got the point it was trying to make, but so many of the letters to the people who set it up were very angry and divisive. As I understood it, it was criticizing many whites who think they&#039;re liberal, but are actually bound by the same stereotypes about African-Americans that more overtly racist types have. And I thought this was a very good point: not all racism is openly hostile, but even well-intentioned ignorance can be painful to its victims. 

I thought the one comment, that sometimes satire can be used to fuel what it&#039;s actually trying to combat (the Itchy and Scratchy example) was something worth thinking about. Reminds me of my disagreement with Chris over Starship Troopers. I thought it was a brilliant and very biting critique of jingoism and a certain world view, while he though it actually promoted them. Similar thing going on here, I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.. I think I got the point it was trying to make, but so many of the letters to the people who set it up were very angry and divisive. As I understood it, it was criticizing many whites who think they&#8217;re liberal, but are actually bound by the same stereotypes about African-Americans that more overtly racist types have. And I thought this was a very good point: not all racism is openly hostile, but even well-intentioned ignorance can be painful to its victims. </p>
<p>I thought the one comment, that sometimes satire can be used to fuel what it&#8217;s actually trying to combat (the Itchy and Scratchy example) was something worth thinking about. Reminds me of my disagreement with Chris over Starship Troopers. I thought it was a brilliant and very biting critique of jingoism and a certain world view, while he though it actually promoted them. Similar thing going on here, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
