<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rational Religion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalspin.com/2003/11/rational-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/rational-religion/</link>
	<description>a glimpse into the tiny mind of Chris Radcliff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nickster</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/rational-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nickster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/06/196/#comment-211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about us Nihilists?

&quot;Ve believe in nussing, Lebowski, NUSSING!&quot;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about us Nihilists?</p>
<p>&#8220;Ve believe in nussing, Lebowski, NUSSING!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debby</title>
		<link>http://globalspin.com/2003/11/rational-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[debby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalspin.com/wp/2003/11/06/196/#comment-210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Universist&quot; is a stupid word.  If you&#039;re going to have a decent movement, you just can&#039;t name it after a stupid word.  Besides, the humanists and theosophists have been there, done that.  What about the Unitarians?  Now, that&#039;s a much better name.

~deb the contrary who&#039;s tired of all the groups to unite (untie?) the groups]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Universist&#8221; is a stupid word.  If you&#8217;re going to have a decent movement, you just can&#8217;t name it after a stupid word.  Besides, the humanists and theosophists have been there, done that.  What about the Unitarians?  Now, that&#8217;s a much better name.</p>
<p>~deb the contrary who&#8217;s tired of all the groups to unite (untie?) the groups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
